According to the manufacturer, dentists can benefit from a complete workflow. With intelligent software, up to 50,000 frames per second can be processed, and automated workflows can be implemented with Cerec software, for example to produce a complete zirconium restoration in one session. Preoperative scans can be used to make post-operative surgery easier and faster, and the dentist can use the collected data as a blueprint to create a natural prosthesis.
Intraoral scanners require only a fraction of the working time to create a conventional impression. You will also get rid of the cost of dental consumables for the manufacture of castings. The itero element of the intraoral scanner is expensive, but it is the ability to scan the inner structure of the teeth and give you real-time feedback.
Intraoral scanners in dentistry shorten the working time of the scan. Performing an intraoral scan is not just a matter of exhausting the scanner if it needs to be.
While we are talking about the scanning efficiency, I would like to address a fundamental problem with test models as opposed to real models of the oral cavity. I would argue that scanning speed alone makes a scanner unsuitable for clinical use where size is irrelevant. In other words, we prefer a scanner that does what it is supposed to do, and does it well.
The scanning depends on the user, the image resolution from the projector, the number of cameras in the scanner and software filters. The software is the secret ingredient of the intraoral scanner and depends on the development team and brand. Intraoral scanner software can be measured by user interface, laboratory connections, third-party software, accessibility, software upgrades and consistency.
The final digital model was reconstructed using a special algorithm that addresses redundancy, noise, incompatible and missing data. Based on the results of previous studies, the optimal method in any of the iOS systems used in this study for the digital scans could not be demonstrated in this study. For the entire surface evaluation, industrial 3D scanners were used to obtain reference data and the datasets of digital models with the superimposition techniques of 3D analysis software were compared.
The combined effects of the various scanning technologies, image processing and image processing software used in the iOS system are responsible for the different mesh functions and truthfulness of different scannsites9. A Korean study group  compared two 3D images collected during in vivo and ex vivo scans to make a cast impression with a trios scanner with 3 shapes. They compared images of a patient with a full set of teeth and a third molar of the same patient every two weeks.
Results revealed a greater discrepancy between the posterior and anterior regions of the dental arch when the two 3D images were collected in vivo and ex vivo scanning were made with cast imprints using a trios scanner with 3 shapes. The average surface difference between the first and second images of the in vivo ii scan was 0.02 mm, which was greater than that of the ex vivo equivalent.
A Korea study (2016) showed no difference between plaster models and intraoral scans, except for measurement of small intermolar width. The accuracy of the measurements was compared with alginate imprints from dental scans, which were based on the recording of the posterior and anterior regions of the intercanine and intermolar distances.
Volumetric changes in the expansion of the impression material of tartar appear to be an error-prone process and require the service of an excellent dental laboratory [1-3].
The introduction of the iOS intraoral scanner in the dental office coincided with the development of CAD / CAM (Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing) in dentistry, which offers numerous benefits for practitioners. Intraoral scanning technology represents a fundamental change for patients and practices. With intraoral scanners, CAD / CAM enables easy planning of treatment cases, acceptance and communication with the laboratory, reduced surgery and storage times, and shorter treatment times [5-7].
Bayshore Dental Studio offers the Intelliscan 3D Intraoral Scanner which simplifies intraoral scanning if you are looking for an intraoral scanner. The benefits are endless and once you begin scanning, you will never forget that you used to deal with chaotic material impressions and slow and expensive workflows.
Simple operation, patient comfort and reliable scanning results. I think you would be wise to wade into digital dentistry with this scanner and add office milling when it suits you. We ordered iteros with the help of Invisalign as additional scanners for crowns, bridges and implants.
One doctor said at the time of publication he owned a Cerec (c) Omnicam scanner and was on the market for a new one. He offered a complete breakdown of his decision-making process to help first time buyers decide the best scanner for their needs.
I was thinking about purchasing an intraoral scanner to replace my imprints in my practice when I saw that many renowned prostheses use PVS as their preferred impression material. The latter is not cheap, but with constant innovation, dentists have time to offer their intraoral scanners for sale and to invest in new and advanced equipment for their clinics. Retailers are also bringing these scanners to market as a result of technological advances.
They were founded in Canada in 2007 and market their dental products in 70 countries for doctors, clinicians and laboratories. One of the solutions is the Virtuo Vivo Intraoral Scanner, which with its low weight of 130 g is reminiscent of a pen. Considering that other companies have added relevant features such as carie detection, fluorescence, motion capture, occlusion, etc., it is easy to build a better scanner from scratch.
It turned out that the scanning time after the training of the scanner was significantly reduced, whereby the average scanning time of the trio was shorter than that of the itero 22.